The dark implications of the number 666 are well known to most people, secular and sacred. It is the number of ‘the beast’ called antichrist, and is given to us in the Bible: Revelation 13:18.
What many don’t know is that other ancient authorities cite 616 as the number of this “beast”. I learned this little known fact when I followed a footnote ascribed to this verse in my own bible, and I have confirmed it here on the internets. I’ve long kept vigil, watching for a time that either of these numbers should be present in connection with any person of power. Today, that watch is over.
You can only imagine the cold dread that coursed through my veins when I saw the results of the Iowa Caucus vote count posted on the Liberty Broadcast Network website. I’ve posted them below as I found them, lest someone from the Huckabee camp (or the devil himself!) realize that they’ve tipped their hand and change up the numbers:
Here you see the Huckabee vote count incorporating not only 666, not only 616, but both! 616 and 666 (if you kind of squint a little to make the digit 1 hard to see). This is no random event, for as Einstein told us, God does not play dice with the universe - and Einstein was really, really smart.
Coincidence you say? I know you would be disappointed if I didn’t make an effort to find more PROOF so that every doubter will have to come to the same ominous conclusion. There’s another way that correlates with these findings EXACTLY.
In the Westernized Pythagorean system of Numerology, we arrange the American alphabet beneath the digits 1 through 9 thusly:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ----------------- A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Now, if you assign a value to each letter according to the table, you will find that this (the beasts name) adds EXACTLY to 666:
Mike “Haa! Did you see how good I did in the Iowa caucus? That proves that God’s with me, Naysayers. Did you know there was a subliminal cross in my Christmas ad? That’s Jesus power, baby.” Huckabee
Add it up yourself, and you will see.
Here, another variation yields EXACTLY 616!!!!!
Mike “Haa! Did you see how good I did in the Iowa caucus? That proves God’s with me. Did you know there was a subliminal cross in my Christmas ad? That’s Jesus power, baby.” Huckabee
This is a message from GOD, people. There are signs everywhere if you just know how to find them.
Peace-
Entries (RSS)
January 4th, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Uh oh, hold the presses. I just checked the vote counts and look what they are now:
Total Votes Reported By Our System
Position Name Votes
1. Mike Huckabee 8,549
2. Mitt Romney 5,103
3. Fred Thompson 2,916
4. John McCain 2,738
5. Ron Paul 2,288
6. Rudy Giuliani 666
7. Duncan Hunter 92
8. Alan Keyes 21
(This is with 83.19% of precincts reporting in so far.)
I swear I’m not making this stuff up. Well, not the numbers, anyway. I think someone from the Huckabee camp changed up the numbers to shift the focus.
Remember: if you switch around the letters of Huckabee-, you get “He be a -uck.”
Just can’t trust these AntiChrists…
January 4th, 2008 at 10:55 pm
Is that talent or an obsessiveness with numerology? I can make 2 + 2 = 4 if I really tried. But it’s too much work so I won’t.
But seriously, the republicans just shot themselves in the foot. They might have well made Pat Robertson the Iowa caucus winner. Their whole party is fracturing. Movement Conservatism is now officially over.
January 4th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
If any of you actually know any southern baptists(I DO) they seem nice on the outside, but there is a big holier than thou and hypocrisy about them and their almost cultlike ways. Disappointing turnout for Paul, but he did beat the “frontrunner” and will now be included in ABCs debate prior to the NH primary.
January 5th, 2008 at 6:34 am
I disagree Pete, this is quite a good turnout for Paul. In a state where he was polling in single digits, his draw was 10%+. This is better than the Paul campaign anticipated. Nationally, we know that Rudy is a strong candidate, and no one is going to dismiss him over Iowa. I’m very encouraged and look forward to New Hampshire’s results. Wyoming, too.
Oh, and the Southern Baptists are holier than thou, Pete.
January 5th, 2008 at 8:59 am
I agree, Frank. Meaningless.
There’s a post in a math forum where Dr. Math explains the route by which a proof that 1 + 1 = 2 may be formulated, Here. Not as simple as it sounds!
January 5th, 2008 at 11:47 am
I told you that math was hard but you didn’t listen Frank. Your fingers deserve what they got.
January 5th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
I wish I were better with topology.
http://www1-c703.uibk.ac.at/mathematik/project/bildergalerie/gallery.html
January 5th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Heh. In case you were wondering about my sanity, I’ll confess that I wrote a quick Javascript program to calculate the values of the Huckabee ‘Names’ to be sure they added to what they were supposed to.
Hucky.html