This is preaching to the choir but it’s still entertaining.
|
5 Responses to “Great video”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. Login » |
Please email all inquiries.This site is best viewed after drinking.
Please email all inquiries.This site is best viewed after drinking.
Powered by WordPress, Mandigo theme by tom.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
November 8th, 2007 at 10:31 pm
Good find Pete. Is that from that new documentary? Doesn’t it make one’s mind spin to know that conservatives are still in glee-to this day-that Bill Clinton lied about a 8low j0b? But how do they keep up with the massively sick lying that has been going on for 7 years? Denial and pride I guess.
Hey Frank, are you still into Rudy Ghoulie? He endorses “enhanced interrogation techniques” aka “torture”. But on the up-side he probably does have the stomach to “drop a few bombs on people now and then”.
{That last line was sarcastic ‘bar-stool diplomacy’.}
November 9th, 2007 at 8:59 pm
Frank, you’ve become quite the armchair general. Between you and me, collectively, we’ve spent about 1 month in the military. Beyond “Barney” can you explain how waterboarding is not really torture even though it was invented during the Spanish Inquisition and was ruled as torture by the Geneva Convention to which the U.S is a signatory and we prosecuted the Japanese after WW2 for practicing it on our soldiers. Where is this “job description”? Point to it. What “fact”?
When Ghouliani is referring to “EIT” he really means torture as does the new Attorney General. This is wrong. Ex-CIA members even say it doesn’t work. The U.S used to be the good guys that even the Nazis would rather surrender to than the Russians because they knew that they would be adequately treated. So torture not only doesn’t work but it actually works against our side.
Also, Frank, who should we bomb “not a lot”?
How do we win this thing against the “terrists”?
What’s the plan?
November 9th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Frank, although the tangents are interesting I find the DJM-400 much more practical. Every house should have one I might get that after I get some of this. http://www.mansinthe.com/
November 11th, 2007 at 2:49 am
and not a moment too soon
When you say not bomb anyone at this moment, who do you think we should bomb in the future?
I’ll add for President Someone who’s honest and puts our country first. and someone who cares about the wellbeing of the citizens of this country.
November 11th, 2007 at 2:22 pm
Frank Hi,
I know that YOU are against torture. I’ve known you for almost 30 years.
Mostly all of it without any form of torture(Ha Ha). Except maybe our game we invented: ‘Make Me Laugh’ which was great because the contestant had to fill his mouth with water and his friends had to make him laugh and/or spit out the water. I wish we could play that game together online.
But also,
Worse still than Jimmy Carter was Reagan. I’m guessing most people are akin to the stigma of ‘weak democrats’ vs ‘tough republicans’ on issues of national security. If I were President in 1979 I would have given the Shah of Iran back to the Iranians to secure the release of our U.S hostages as they wanted. Screw the Shah. 444 days IS shameful for Carter, I agree. He tried to execute a rescue mission but that failed. But what’s worse is that it was later proven that the Reagan Administration arranged the infamous “arms for hostages deal”. They gave the Iranians missiles. Not a good message if you want to prevent future terrorism. They released our Americans on Reagan’s inauguration day. Go figure.
So which is worse: a weak democrat or a conniving republican?
I don’t know either. They both suck if you ask me.
And I completely agree about working together Frank. I’m not fighting.
I just love a good debate.
About the want ad for president, “Does not need to be pretty.” Are you sure?
That would still leave Hillary in the race. O.k bad joke. But I would pick:
Must set this country on a course of progress and true unity making people
come first and limiting corporate control of society.