Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-settings.php on line 512

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-settings.php on line 527

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-settings.php on line 534

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-settings.php on line 570

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/dwbritt/subdomains/blog.clevermonkey.net/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109
clevermonkey blog » Temporal Motivational Theory

After ten years of focused research, Dr. Piers Steele published a comprehensive study of procrastination: “The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure.” pdf here.

Steele asserts a formula, “Temporal Motivational Theory”:

Utility = E x V/ÃD

     E = The expectancy a person has of succeeding with the given task
     V = The value of completing the given task
     Ã = The immediacy or availability of the given task
     D = The person's sensitivity to Delay
     Utility = The desirability of the task

From the abstract:

Procrastination is a prevalent and pernicious form of self-regulatory failure that is not entirely understood. Hence, the relevant conceptual, theoretical, and empirical work is reviewed, drawing upon correlational, experimental, and qualitative findings. A meta-analysis of procrastination’s possible causes and effects, based on 691 correlations, reveals that neuroticism, rebelliousness, and sensation seeking show only a weak connection. Strong and consistent predictors of procrastination were task aversiveness, task delay, self-efficacy, and impulsiveness, as well as conscientiousness and its facets of self-control, distractibility, organization, and achievement motivation. These effects prove consistent with temporal motivation theory, an integrative hybrid of expectancy theory and hyperbolic discounting. Continued research into procrastination should not be delayed, especially because its prevalence appears to be growing.

Measure your procrastination according to this formula here, at procrastinus.

8 Responses to “Temporal Motivational Theory”
  1. John says:

    I’ll get around to taking that test sooner or later…

  2. Mr. Nibbles says:

    Wow.
    30 Pages of BS.
    Give that man a swift kick to the groin.

  3. Justin says:

    I wonder if they wrote that paper during the periods of time when they had more important stuff to work on, but didn’t want to.

  4. Mr. Nibbles says:

    Calgary.
    Ten months of winter.

  5. Dave says:

    You can bet I wrote that post when I had more important stuff to work on but didn’t want to.

  6. Mr. Nibbles says:

    We could write a better one sentence piece on this subject, focusing more on how to overcome procrastination rather than pretending to calculate its intensity with “expectancy theory and hyperbolic discounting.”
    I find wiggling my pinky works well.

  7. Dave says:

    My knees never click or snap.

  8. Mr. Nibbles says:

    Do they crackle or pop?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment. Login »

clevermonkey.net ©2007 All rights reserved. We especially reserve the right to fling poo.
Please email all inquiries.This site is best viewed after drinking.